No, but I decided that after Lawrence's post that he doesn't have any problems, I decided to uninstall and reinstall SystemWorks. That did it. Don't know why, don't care *LOL*. Long as it works *S* Thanks. Carl > Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:44:17 -0500 > From: "Michael Luchini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [ShareTheNet] Symantec Liveupdate > > > I use Symantec LiveUpdate behind STN without any problems.. Has the Update > license expired ? > What version of the software are you using? > > Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: C Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 3:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ShareTheNet] Symantec Liveupdate > > > Is anyone able to get the Norton Symantec LiveUpdate feature to work behind > STN? I haven't been able to get a connection for several weeks unless I go > through an analog modem and bypass STN. > -- > Visit http://www.ShareTheNet.com for info about ShareTheNet > Visit http://www.topica.com/lists/sharethenet for info about this list > _________________________________________________________ > Enlighten your in-box. http://www.topica.com/t/15 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: RE: [ShareTheNet] Symantec Liveupdate > > > I have the same problem. I haven't tried to debug it, so I don't really have > any details except that LiveUpdate quit working after I installed STN. > It hasn't bothered me too much because I can circumvent the problem by > downloading updates manually over the Web. > > > -- > David D. Anderson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I use Symantec LiveUpdate behind STN without any problems.. Has the Update > > license expired ? > > What version of the software are you using? > > > > Mike > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 31-Mar-2000 16:47:08 GMT > From: Jim Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: > > > You can't use a fax, (or a "fax" i.e. fax software), through the STN, > because the signalling is different. The modem can send either faxes, > or computer data, but not both at the same time. > > Also - in order to use the fax features of a modem (say the one on the > STN box) you'd have to have a fax server installed there. > > The bottom line is that you absolutely can -SHARE- the line with a fax > machine - not unlike sharing with a teenager ;-) > > If the STN service is using the line, the fax machine has to wait. > Likewise, if the fax is using the line, STN cannot dial out. > > Also - because STN does not -ANSWER- the phone, you can have a fax > hooked up to the same line thru a splitter, and (if STN is not hogging > the phone :) ), incoming faxes can be received. > > In essence, this is the same scenario as having one line at home, and > sharing it between computer time and voice time. > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 31-Mar-2000 16:47:40 GMT > From: Jim Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: > > > Do you have passive turned on? > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:27:12 -0500 > From: "C Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [ShareTheNet] Symantec Liveupdate > > > Hmmm..then it must be something with my ISP. > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 18:36:23 -0500 > > From: "Lawrence K. Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: [ShareTheNet] Symantec Liveupdate > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: C Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Is anyone able to get the Norton Symantec LiveUpdate feature to > > > work behind > > > STN? I haven't been able to get a connection for several weeks unless I > go > > > through an analog modem and bypass STN. > > > > I haven't had any problems with mine....and I didn't do anything special > for > > it. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:27:22 -0500 > From: "C Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: New subscriber with a novice? question > > > Any message on the subject of STN is appropriate. I can't answer your > question, but hopefully someone can. I think we are basically > self-moderated; i.e. if you send something inappropriate, like an > advertisement for a competing product, you will hear about it from several > folks here *LOL*. The author of the software, John Lombardo, has been known > to post answers here, so I assume he tracks the posts. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:39:49 -0800 > > From: "Saul Kanowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: New subscriber with a novice? question > > > > > > Can one use a fax program with the share the net portal?? I am running a > > small 4 pc peer-to-peer Windows 98 network. I just set up stn and its > > working fine. Can I use the small phone line that STN uses to do broadcast > > faxes?? > > > > I don't know if there is a moderator of this list. Someone should let me > > know if this kind of question is appropriate for this list. > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:28:07 -0500 > From: "C Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Thread length > > > Well, thats not exactly what I meant. What I meant was that when you hit > "reply", the previous messages get appended to the end of your message. If > you don't delete anything, it all gets sent along with your reply. For > example, you will notice that your message follows this paragraph, with ">" > signs in front of each line. My original message follows that, with two ">" > signs before each line. If we continue this way, the thread just grows and > grows, as do the number of ">" signs. So, for example, I have deleted half > of my original message just to show that it can be done :). Normally, I > would have deleted the entire message and left only your most recent reply > quoted, unless more information is needed to make the reply clear. Hope this > is clearer. Sorry for the confusion. > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Date: Thu, 30-Mar-2000 21:48:18 GMT > > From: Jim Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Thread length > > > > > > OK, works for me. > > > > 1. I had no idea that I had "delete" authority on this list. (I, > > perhaps naievly, assumed that the list admin was the only one who could > > do that. . .) > > > > 2. -HOW- do I do this? > > > > Jim > > > > C Nelson wrote: > > > Just a friendly little reminder, folks: > > > > > > It is considered courteous and bandwidth-friendly to delete old messages > > > before you send your reply to the latest message in a thread. The recent > > > discussion about DHCP/DSN/NT grew to be a number of message replies, and > > > the > > > authors were not deleting the old messages in the thread, so 5K worth of > > > new > > > information in the digest document took up 95K. Besides eating up > > > bandwidth > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 31-Mar-2000 17:48:38 GMT > From: Jim Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Thread length > > > Not a prob dude! > > (and thanks for pointing this out to all us "Duh!" award winners > (grin!!) ) > > Actually, I was thinking that this is like a usenet group - (since I do > this all thru the web), and did not even -think- of deleting the excess > baggage. > > The reminder, and tip, is appreciated. > > Jim > > C Nelson wrote: > > Well, thats not exactly what I meant. What I meant was that when you hit > > "reply", the previous messages get appended to the end of your message. > > If > > you don't delete anything, it all gets sent along with your reply. For > > example, you will notice that your message follows this paragraph, with > > ">" > > signs in front of each line. My original message follows that, with two > > ">" > > signs before each line. If we continue this way, the thread just grows > > and > > grows, as do the number of ">" signs. So, for example, I have deleted > > half > > of my original message just to show that it can be done :). Normally, I > > would have deleted the entire message and left only your most recent > > reply > > quoted, unless more information is needed to make the reply clear. Hope > > this > > is clearer. Sorry for the confusion. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Date: Thu, 30-Mar-2000 21:48:18 GMT > > > From: Jim Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: RE: Thread length > > < OK!! Snip already!!! ;) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:05:49 -0600 > From: Arnie Rothenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [ShareTheNet] Symantec Liveupdate > > > I was just going to tell you that I have always been able to LiveUpdate through > STN and cable just fine. > > Figured I'd better go and check first. It hung on connecting to Symantec > Server. I needed to cancel and then try it again immediately. Finally went > through. > > Yes, it does work for me. > > C Nelson wrote: > > > Is anyone able to get the Norton Symantec LiveUpdate feature to work behind > > STN? I haven't been able to get a connection for several weeks unless I go > > through an analog modem and bypass STN. > > -- > > Visit http://www.ShareTheNet.com for info about ShareTheNet > > Visit http://www.topica.com/lists/sharethenet for info about this list > > _________________________________________________________ > > Enlighten your in-box. http://www.topica.com/t/15 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:09:16 -0800 > From: "John Dunleavy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [ShareTheNet] New subscriber with a novice? question > > > Saul, > > I'm basically doing just that here, with a different machine dialing > out to send faxes - thus not going through STN itself. My STN > machine is a dedicated floppy-only '486 connected to the rest over > ethernet. The only catch is that we can only use that phone line > for one purpose or the other at any one time. I.e., FAX or STN, not > both. > > I don't disconnect the STN machine, just fire up the FAXmodem > and send what I need to, and then PING a foreign address (i.e, one > outside my network) to make STN reestablish its connection. > Takes only a few seconds normally. I do, of course, check that my > wife is not doing something online before doing this - I'm not ready > to get killed just yet. ;-> > > HTH > > John > > > Can one use a fax program with the share the net portal?? I am running a > > small 4 pc peer-to-peer Windows 98 network. I just set up stn > and its > > working fine. Can I use the small phone line that STN uses to do broadcast > > faxes?? > > ========================================================== > John Dunleavy Schertz & Dunleavy > 81 Worcester Street Boston, MA 02118 > 617-267-5709 TTY 617-867-9576 FAX > ========================================================== > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sat, 1-Apr-2000 04:20:53 GMT > From: Jim Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Run STN from DOS? > > > Summary: I would like to know if anyone knows how to run STN -after- > booting DOS. (say, using LOADLIN or such-like) > > Details: > > I am working on getting STN to work on a 486 MoBo w/o a PnP BIOS. > The 3Com internal "conventional" modem that I have, is a purely PnP > modem. (no jumpers, and no way to set static settings in hardware or > NOVRAM.) > > Normally this is not an issue as the O/S I was using it with supports > PnP. However, with STN, there is no way to "program" the cards > parameters before it tries to initialize it. > > 3Com does provide a DOS utility that sets the cards paramaters from the > command line (or a batch file). > > So, it seems to me that I need to start DOS, run this little program, > and then start STN. > > Is this doable? I have heard that earlier versions of STN used the DOS > system files on the floppy it was running off of. Can I do that with > -this- version too? > > Jim > > > ------------------------------ > > > > -- > Visit http://www.ShareTheNet.com for info about ShareTheNet > Visit http://www.topica.com/lists/sharethenet for info about this list > > End of [EMAIL PROTECTED] digest, issue 80 > > -- Visit http://www.ShareTheNet.com for info about ShareTheNet Visit http://www.topica.com/lists/sharethenet for info about this list _________________________________________________________ Enlighten your in-box. http://www.topica.com/t/15
