Because I no longer have access to the website, here is my one in SVG
format. You guys are still welcome to use it.

On 13/02/2008, Darx Kies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Markham wrote:
> > IMHO, I don't think we should be talking about any sort of official
> > logo unless someone around here wants to fork over the cash to get it
> > properly trademarked, and hold the trademark in esgrow for the group.
> IMHO it is about time to choose a logo. We already have a couple of
> them. Later we can still choose another one if ppl agree with it. It is
> only that a Logo is better than nothing as it is right now.
>
> > I think I would also like to spend time on a logo, but I have not had
> > time to do it, much less find my installer for an appropriate program.
> > Which leads me to...
> You could use Inkscape. Easy to use and runs everywhere.
>
> That brings me to the next point. Some Logos have their .svg files
> uploaded (at the bottom of the logo page), that means you guys if you
> don't like the color scheme or the font or anything
> you can download the .svg file and use for example Inkscape to modify
> them and upload them next to the other Logos.
>
> >
> > As part of my first objection, we need to consider project-branding
> > issues. Do we want an official color scheme? And how permanent is any
> > branding we do, going to be? Because we might see some particularly
> > awesome logos down the road, but not want to offend the previous logo
> > champion.
> >
> > And some things, like the friggin awesome shark picture, really don't
> > fit for a project logo, but would be great for a sub-project logo
> > (like a Window manager or something.)
> >
> > Maciej: There are a few of us around here that particularly like the
> > chicken and the egg. (And by definition, they have to go together.)
> > But I agree with William, thats something we can all decide as a group
> > as well.
> >
> > So I don't want to hose things up by being anal, (most of the time I
> > put my 2 cents in, I complicate things to the point where things reach
> > a grinding halt - like the hardware thread I've tried to start on 3 or
> > 4 occasions where I've mostly been ignored) - but if we are deciding
> > that we need to decide something, we need to make some decisions about
> > what we are deciding. ;-)
> As you said you make it too complicated. ;)
> We can choose another logo later and IMHO we should concentrate on other
> more important stuff in our limited spare than talking about colors
> schemes and stuff. :D
>
> Chriss.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> SharpOS-Developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
>


-- 
Jonathan

<<attachment: SharpOS Concept 2.svg>>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
SharpOS-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers

Reply via email to