Ooooooooooooooo! [ephiphone moment experienced]
WOW that makes total sense. I actually spoke with a cohort last night about this. I'm good friends with a computer modeller. I am going to ask him if he can model the project so when we make cuts we make them PRECISE. This is important since I have been hammering home the handling advantages. I have two G-bodies. I have no sanity. I have no shame. I have no reason not to at least do the planning for this, and then maybe, go through with it. It would be a er job than the Shadow.. Those guys blew us away with literally their throwtogether project. It's awesome. But I want something clean, functional, and beneficial. I wouldn't be happy with a hastilly-grafted setup. The boys with the Shadow have paved the way IMO for a refined approach. I think they are great for what they've done. Now maybe someone can step it up a notch. In a G-body. -J Southern California Forced Induction 1989 Dodge Daytona Shelby Turbo II 1986 Chrysler Laser XE Turbo 1990 Plymouth Laser RS Turbo 1991 Mitsu Eclispe GSX Turbo(for sale) 1990 VW Corrado G60 Supercharged (possibly revived?) 1984 Nissan 200SX Turbo 1985 Nissan 200SX Turbo 1983 Datsun 280ZX Turbo -----Original Message----- Just some details to consider in a twin-engine (2E) Daytona.>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely no need for two alternators. What I would suggest is to ditch an alternator. Uh-oh... then one engine has a little more power than the other. O.K... ditch the alternator off the front engine and the power gain should be offset by not having the power steering pump on the rear engine. Hmmm.... I have visions of sugar plums dancing in my head!! Later -----------------------REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING---------------------------- Questions? Visit http://www.sdml.org/ To be removed, visit http://www.sdml.org/pages/leave.html
