Ok, great.

Currently all of the shindig java and javascript code has the standard
apache license header:

 Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
>  you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
>  You may obtain a copy of the License at
>
>      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>
>  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>  distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>  limitations under the License.
>

Should I change that to:

Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
> or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
> distributed with this work for additional information
> regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
> to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
> "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
> with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>
> Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
> software distributed under the License is distributed on an
> "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
> KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
> specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.
>

In all source files now?

~Kevin

On Jan 8, 2008 1:41 PM, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Forgot to paste the url :)
>
> Vincent
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>
> 2008/1/8, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > XML files and others source files [1]
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> > 2008/1/8, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Does anyone know if we should be including the apache license header
> in xml
> > > documents? I'm about to add several configuration files and it would
> be good
> > > to know before I commit.
> > >
> > > ~Kevin
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to