There's currently 31 files with the correct "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation", whilst 93 files have the incorrect "Licensed under the Apache License".
Should all the 95 files be switched to the "Licensed under" version? I was going to work on this now. On Jan 8, 2008 2:46 PM, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Yes, the last header is correct. Also, you need to be sure that > LICENSE and NOTICE files are in the artifacts (i.e. jar) [1]. I will > quickly open an issue for this. > > Cheers, > > Vincent > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distribute-raw-artifact > > 2008/1/8, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Ok, great. > > > > Currently all of the shindig java and javascript code has the standard > > apache license header: > > > > Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); > > > you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. > > > You may obtain a copy of the License at > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > > > > > Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software > > > distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, > > > WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or > implied. > > > See the License for the specific language governing permissions and > > > limitations under the License. > > > > > > > Should I change that to: > > > > Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one > > > or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file > > > distributed with this work for additional information > > > regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file > > > to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the > > > "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance > > > with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > > > > > Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > > > software distributed under the License is distributed on an > > > "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY > > > KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the > > > specific language governing permissions and limitations under the > License. > > > > > > > In all source files now? > > > > ~Kevin > > > > On Jan 8, 2008 1:41 PM, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > Forgot to paste the url :) > > > > > > Vincent > > > > > > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > > > > > 2008/1/8, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > XML files and others source files [1] > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Vincent > > > > > > > > 2008/1/8, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know if we should be including the apache license > header > > > in xml > > > > > documents? I'm about to add several configuration files and it > would > > > be good > > > > > to know before I commit. > > > > > > > > > > ~Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
