The problem is even if I specify the fields to return:
personOpts[opensocial.DataRequest.PeopleRequestFields.PROFILE_DETAILS] =
[opensocial.Person.Field.AGE,
opensocial.Person.Field.NAME,
opensocial.Person.Field.GENDER,
opensocial.Person.Field.PROFILE_URL,
opensocial.Person.Field.THUMBNAIL_URL,
opensocial.Person.Field.STATUS];
I only ever get a Set<String> profileDetails which contains:
["id","name","thumbnailUrl"]
Ray
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 17:12 -0400, Raymond Auge wrote:
> This is not using the sample backend... it's using a custom
> implementation... the problem is that
>
> ["id","name","thumbnailUrl"]
>
> are the only fields ever requested.
>
> Set<String> profileDetails only ever contains those three items... of
> course if I add the fields explicitly they are available, but that isn't
> really what the problem is...
>
>
> Ray
>
> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 23:07 +0200, Chris Chabot wrote:
>
> > The basic samplecontainer xml file has no data in those fields, and if
> > the field is empty (null) it's not included in the json thats returned.
> >
> > If you'd open the xml file & added those fields, the warning would go
> > away :)
> >
> > -- Chris
> >
> > On Apr 15, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Raymond Auge wrote:
> >
> > > If I add more supported fields to syndicators.js
> > >
> > > e.g.
> > >
> > > "person" : ["id", "name", "profileUrl", "thumbnailUrl",
> > > "nickname", "emails", "gender", "phoneNumbers", "timeZone"],
> > >
> > > when I run the compliancetest.xml (which seems to pass all the
> > > supported
> > > Fields in the request) I get:
> > >
> > > Your object did not have a result for the nickname field. This may be
> > > confusing for users.
> > > ...
> > >
> > > even though the backend does support it... seems that the fields never
> > > are passed in the request:
> > >
> > > e.g.
> > >
> > > [{"type":"FETCH_PEOPLE","idSpec":"OWNER","profileDetail":
> > > ["id
> > > ","name
> > > ","thumbnailUrl"],"sortOrder":"topFriends","filter":"all","first":
> > > 0,"max":20},{"type":"FETCH_PEOPLE","idSpec":"VIEWER","profileDetail":
> > > ["id
> > > ","name
> > > ","thumbnailUrl"],"sortOrder":"topFriends","filter":"all","first":
> > > 0,"max":20}]
> > > [{"type":"FETCH_PEOPLE","idSpec":"VIEWER","profileDetail":
> > > ["id
> > > ","name
> > > ","thumbnailUrl"],"sortOrder":"topFriends","filter":"all","first":
> > > 0,"max":20},{"type":"FETCH_PERSON_APP_DATA","idSpec":"VIEWER","keys":
> > > ["goodKey"]}]
> > >
> > > I take it this is known?
> > >
> > > Raymond Augé
> > > Software Engineer
> > > Liferay, Inc.
> > > Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.
> >
> >
>
> Raymond Augé
> Software Engineer
> Liferay, Inc.
> Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.
Raymond Augé
Software Engineer
Liferay, Inc.
Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.
