As it turns out, after much scouring of the shindig codebase, I realized
to my chagrin that the problem is that the compliancetests.xml (from
code.google.com) is NOT compliant. In fact it has a small bug which
caused the problem.
See Patch attached.
Ray
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 11:12 +0200, Cassie wrote:
> Okay, best bet is to file a jira issue and we can look into it.
> I'll see if I can find it now...
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Raymond Auge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem is even if I specify the fields to return:
> >
> >
> > personOpts[opensocial.DataRequest.PeopleRequestFields.PROFILE_DETAILS] =
> > [opensocial.Person.Field.AGE,
> > opensocial.Person.Field.NAME,
> > opensocial.Person.Field.GENDER,
> > opensocial.Person.Field.PROFILE_URL,
> > opensocial.Person.Field.THUMBNAIL_URL,
> > opensocial.Person.Field.STATUS];
> >
> > I only ever get a Set<String> profileDetails which contains:
> >
> > ["id","name","thumbnailUrl"]
> >
> >
> > Ray
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 17:12 -0400, Raymond Auge wrote:
> >
> >> This is not using the sample backend... it's using a custom
> >> implementation... the problem is that
> >>
> >> ["id","name","thumbnailUrl"]
> >>
> >> are the only fields ever requested.
> >>
> >> Set<String> profileDetails only ever contains those three items... of
> >> course if I add the fields explicitly they are available, but that isn't
> >> really what the problem is...
> >>
> >>
> >> Ray
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 23:07 +0200, Chris Chabot wrote:
> >>
> >> > The basic samplecontainer xml file has no data in those fields, and if
> >> > the field is empty (null) it's not included in the json thats returned.
> >> >
> >> > If you'd open the xml file & added those fields, the warning would go
> >> > away :)
> >> >
> >> > -- Chris
> >> >
> >> > On Apr 15, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Raymond Auge wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > If I add more supported fields to syndicators.js
> >> > >
> >> > > e.g.
> >> > >
> >> > > "person" : ["id", "name", "profileUrl", "thumbnailUrl",
> >> > > "nickname", "emails", "gender", "phoneNumbers", "timeZone"],
> >> > >
> >> > > when I run the compliancetest.xml (which seems to pass all the
> >> > > supported
> >> > > Fields in the request) I get:
> >> > >
> >> > > Your object did not have a result for the nickname field. This may be
> >> > > confusing for users.
> >> > > ...
> >> > >
> >> > > even though the backend does support it... seems that the fields never
> >> > > are passed in the request:
> >> > >
> >> > > e.g.
> >> > >
> >> > > [{"type":"FETCH_PEOPLE","idSpec":"OWNER","profileDetail":
> >> > > ["id
> >> > > ","name
> >> > > ","thumbnailUrl"],"sortOrder":"topFriends","filter":"all","first":
> >> > > 0,"max":20},{"type":"FETCH_PEOPLE","idSpec":"VIEWER","profileDetail":
> >> > > ["id
> >> > > ","name
> >> > > ","thumbnailUrl"],"sortOrder":"topFriends","filter":"all","first":
> >> > > 0,"max":20}]
> >> > > [{"type":"FETCH_PEOPLE","idSpec":"VIEWER","profileDetail":
> >> > > ["id
> >> > > ","name
> >> > > ","thumbnailUrl"],"sortOrder":"topFriends","filter":"all","first":
> >> > > 0,"max":20},{"type":"FETCH_PERSON_APP_DATA","idSpec":"VIEWER","keys":
> >> > > ["goodKey"]}]
> >> > >
> >> > > I take it this is known?
> >> > >
> >> > > Raymond Augé
> >> > > Software Engineer
> >> > > Liferay, Inc.
> >> > > Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Raymond Augé
> >> Software Engineer
> >> Liferay, Inc.
> >> Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.
> >
> > Raymond Augé
> > Software Engineer
> > Liferay, Inc.
> > Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.
> >
>
Raymond Augé
Software Engineer
Liferay, Inc.
Enterprise. Open Source. For Life.
--- compliancetests.xml 2008-04-16 08:54:34.000000000 -0400
+++ compliancetests-mine.xml 2008-04-15 17:28:03.000000000 -0400
@@ -394,8 +394,8 @@
addInfoRow(testName, errorLevel, "Your supported person fields: " + supportedFields.join(", "));
var req = opensocial.newDataRequest();
- req.add(req.newFetchPersonRequest('OWNER', {'profileDetails' : supportedFields}), 'owner');
- req.add(req.newFetchPersonRequest('VIEWER', {'profileDetails' : supportedFields}), 'viewer');
+ req.add(req.newFetchPersonRequest('OWNER', {'profileDetail' : supportedFields}), 'owner');
+ req.add(req.newFetchPersonRequest('VIEWER', {'profileDetail' : supportedFields}), 'viewer');
req.send(function(response) {
if (!response.get('owner') || !response.get('owner').getData()) {
