Sound good. Looking forward to the patch.

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 -- I like this a lot, even if it is slightly more complex.
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  >
>  > Looking at the patch and just having updated from svn, I think this means
>  > that
>  > in addition to the patch Cassie is working on....
>  >
>  > java/social-api   becomes a jar
>  > java/gadget        becomes a jar
>  >
>  > ---------
>  > There is a new project to build a overlay war from features/**
>  > javascript/** config/** ,
>  > perhapse split into 2, one for gadgets and one for social-api (not certain
>  > about the split)
>  > eg
>  >
>  > java/gadget-resources
>  > java/social-api-resources
>  >
>  > These just contain a pom.xml that builds the overlay.
>  >
>  > ----------------
>  > Then there is a new webapp
>  > java/server
>  >
>  > That contains src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml
>  >
>  > that unpacks the overlay wars, pulls in the jars and packages as a war...
>  > for running in jetty.
>  >
>  > This would not enforce boundaries between social-api and gadget, but would
>  > enable both to run, and for others to construct a target.
>  >
>  >
>  > Perhaps thats too complex and there could be some simplification.... I
>  > would be happy to generate a patch once Cassie is done....
>  >
>  >
>  > One other thing. I have found that the maven plugins that build sites
>  > (less important) and perform releases(more important) are picky about the
>  > relationship between the directory name, the artifact ID, how the group ID
>  > changes as the directory structure gets  deeper.
>  >
>  > If you want to use these plugins in multiproject mode, then it probably
>  > worth trying them now... just to make certain that they do work. If the
>  > entire build is maven2 based, the the release plugin is well worth the
>  > hassle Changing artifact names and structure later an be a complete pain,
>  > see https://source.sakaiproject.org/svn//kernel/trunk/ to see what I mean.
>  >
>  > Ian
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On 16 Apr 2008, at 00:40, Kevin Brown wrote:
>  >
>  > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >
>  > >  One way might be...
>  > > >
>  > > > add a webapp project that takes a jar from gadgets and a jar from
>  > > > social
>  > > > api and a jar from common and builds the war.
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > That's what I'm in favor of doing.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  It might also overlay wars or zips containing all the javascript html
>  > > > and
>  > > > css files.. so that in the war project there is just the web.xml
>  > > > thatis used
>  > > > for a sample deployment.
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > These would belong in there as well, as resources.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > >
>  > > > Then with the jetty target, run that war.
>  > > >
>  > > > For those who want to construct their own webapp and perhaps customize
>  > > > the
>  > > > injection of the service layer, they can pull the gadgets jar, the
>  > > > social-api jar and the javascript zip/jar/war from the maven repo and
>  > > > merge
>  > > > with their own webapp project (with a customized web.xml, service
>  > > > implementation jar and guice service module)
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > And that's exactly what I've been asking for. It's exactly what I want
>  > > to do
>  > > for our deployments at google, and I'm sure it's a model that other
>  > > people
>  > > would like as well.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > Ian
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > > > On 15 Apr 2008, at 17:08, Cassie wrote:
>  > > >
>  > > >  Okay, so I think we are mostly in agreement that the setup of the
>  > > > > Shindig java code needs to evolve towards something like this:
>  > > > >
>  > > > > java/gadgets/* -- gadget rendering code
>  > > > > java/social-api/* -- code for serving social data (eventually all in
>  > > > > the restful wire format)
>  > > > > java/common/* -- all the rest of the common code shared by everybody
>  > > > >
>  > > > > In order to start going this direction I have a patch that does the
>  > > > > following:
>  > > > > 1. Moves the java social code and javatests social code into the
>  > > > > java/social-api component (out of java/gadgets)
>  > > > > 2. Moves the socialdata servlet registration from the gadgets
>  > > > > web.xml
>  > > > > to the social-api web.xml
>  > > > > 3. Moves the pom/parent/pom.xml into java/pom.xml This is necessary
>  > > > > for making a multi-module project (See things like this:
>  > > > > http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-05-2006/jw-0529-maven.html
>  > > > > ?page=2
>  > > > > for more info) We need a multi-module project because currently
>  > > > > social-api depends on gadgets (and eventually they will both depend
>  > > > > on
>  > > > > common)
>  > > > >
>  > > > > Using this ridiculously large patch you can do the following:
>  > > > > - use mvn jetty:run-war in java/gadgets like usual. however, the
>  > > > > socialdata servlet won't be there and so all social stuff will break
>  > > > > (including the samplecontainer - we will have to fix this later)
>  > > > > - use mvn compile in java/ to compile all the gadgets stuff and all
>  > > > > the social-api stuff.
>  > > > > - use mvn jetty:run in java/social-api to run the social server (ie
>  > > > > the socialdata servlet) this has to be done after the compile.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > We could do mvn:jetty-run in the top directory if we put in a
>  > > > > web.xml
>  > > > > file. This may be the best option for the samplecontainer and
>  > > > > example
>  > > > > friends.
>  > > > > Oh, and please tell me if there is a better way to do this!
>  > > > >
>  > > > > Please review this patch, I would like it to go in soon:
>  > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-199
>  > > > >
>  > > > > And note: this is a regression! So after I commit this people should
>  > > > > probably not sync up their svn clients if they are dependent on the
>  > > > > samplecontainer or the tight integration between socialdata and the
>  > > > > gagdet renderer. We'll fix it all again soon somehow.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > Thanks.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > - Cassie
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > ~Kevin
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  --
>  ~Kevin
>

Reply via email to