On 16 Apr 2008, at 12:30, Cassie wrote:
Alright Ian - my change is in, so let's make yours work.
Should we pull out a java/common directory that both gadgets and the
social-api poms depend on? We could check in an empty directory for
now just as a place holder so that we can get the structure right.
Yes that makes sense, even if it results in an empty jar, we have the
placeholder and the plumbing.
As for the resources:
- features = gadgets server
- config = gadgets server
- javascript = a joint server which has both gadgets and social-api
running?
Ok, I will give that a go.
I think that is close to what we may want...
- Cassie
--snip--
