On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Kevin Brown wrote:
>
>>        A far more appropriate solution is probably to enhance the
>>        content rewriter that Louis has written to support cajoling as
>>        one of the rewriting options.
>>
>>    Where does that code live?
>>
>> .../gadgets/rewrite/...
>>
>>    How would that option be specified?
>>
>>
>> I think gadgets should be flagged as cajolable externally. Anything else
>> would require spec changes or being non-standard.
>>
>
> What do you mean by "flagged as cajolable externally"?
>
> In practice, it seems to me there are three scenarios:
>
> 1. Container allows gadgets to choose freely whether they are cajoled or
> not (more likely a sandbox than a live server).
>
> 2. Container forces Caja on all gadgets.
>
> 3. Container forces Caja on all gadgets except a whitelist (and those might
> choose to be Cajoled after all).


#3 is exactly what I expect.#1 isn't possible without spec changes. #2 might
be viable, assuming that it's possible for all / almost all gadgets to run
cajoled.

>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html           http://www.links.org/
>
> "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
> doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
>

Reply via email to