Kevin Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:Kevin Brown wrote: A far more appropriate solution is probably to enhance the content rewriter that Louis has written to support cajoling asone of the rewriting options. Where does that code live?.../gadgets/rewrite/...How would that option be specified?I think gadgets should be flagged as cajolable externally. Anything else would require spec changes or being non-standard. What do you mean by "flagged as cajolable externally"? In practice, it seems to me there are three scenarios: 1. Container allows gadgets to choose freely whether they are cajoled or not (more likely a sandbox than a live server). 2. Container forces Caja on all gadgets. 3. Container forces Caja on all gadgets except a whitelist (and those might choose to be Cajoled after all). #3 is exactly what I expect.#1 isn't possible without spec changes.
Why not? They can <Require Feature="caja"> surely?
#2 might be viable, assuming that it's possible for all / almost all gadgets to run cajoled.
We have to get there from here, and to do that, we need to support 1.
Cheers, Ben.-- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
-- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
