It makes sense to me, though since they're strings it'll mean a bit of find and replace work. If you want to take care of it, though, I don't see any big issues with it.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do people think about this proposal? > > It would involve modifying the names used in gadget.properties and @Named > annotations. > > > > On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Paul Lindner (JIRA) wrote: > > Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: SHINDIG-481 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-481 >> Project: Shindig >> Issue Type: Improvement >> Components: Common Components (Java) >> Reporter: Paul Lindner >> Assignee: Paul Lindner >> >> >> By overriding DefaultGuiceModule I was able to replace the properties >> source with our common properties source. >> >> If this becomes common practice it would be preferable to namespace the >> names in gadgets.properties by adding a 'shindig.' prefix. >> >> For example >> >> http.cache.negativeCacheTtl >> >> becomes >> >> shindig.http.cache.negativeCacheTtl=30000 >> >> >> >> -- >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> - >> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >> >> > Paul Lindner > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >
