On Jul 31, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Kevin Brown wrote:
It makes sense to me, though since they're strings it'll mean a bit
of find
and replace work. If you want to take care of it, though, I don't
see any
big issues with it.
Thanks, this will help with our integration at hi5 quite a bit.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What do people think about this proposal?
It would involve modifying the names used in gadget.properties and
@Named
annotations.
On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Paul Lindner (JIRA) wrote:
Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
-------------------------------------------------------------
Key: SHINDIG-481
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-481
Project: Shindig
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Common Components (Java)
Reporter: Paul Lindner
Assignee: Paul Lindner
By overriding DefaultGuiceModule I was able to replace the
properties
source with our common properties source.
If this becomes common practice it would be preferable to
namespace the
names in gadgets.properties by adding a 'shindig.' prefix.
For example
http.cache.negativeCacheTtl
becomes
shindig.http.cache.negativeCacheTtl=30000
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Paul Lindner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Lindner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
