El mar, 14-04-2009 a las 15:37 +0200, Chris Chabot escribió:
> FYi the prefered packaging format for php-shindig is generated by the
> shindig/php/make-release.sh file.
>
> in the 1.0.x branch it's version is currently set on 1.0, so just executing
> it will give you the appropriate php-shindig-1.0.0.{tar.bz2,.tar.gz,zip}
> files.
>
> I'll do a final test on them once you guys are release ready too, but in
> principle the 1.0.x branch & release script have been ready since nov last
> year, so I don't expect any surprises on that end
>
Is there provision for signing the releases? I can sign the keys of
whoever is going to do it if we get some out of band, remote way to
verify identity WRT keys signature.
Regards
Santiago
> -- Chris
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Vincent Siveton <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > I guess the plan should be:
> > * release discussions: done by this thread
> > * prepare the release: mvn release:prepare which tags the code
> > * make the release: mvn release:perform which pushes (signed)
> > artifacts to repository.apache.org
> > * stage the generated Maven documentation
> > * propose a vote on this list: mail should include the urls and the
> > closed/left issues.
> > * ask Incubator PMC for the release
> > * publish and announce the release
> >
> > Anything else?
> >
> > If everybody is agree with this plan, I could try to start the process
> > this week.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> > 2009/4/13 Ian Boston <[email protected]>:
> > > Being a release newbie with a desire to step into the unknown, what needs
> > to
> > > be done ?
> > > presumably, build some artifacts, sign them, put them somewhere, agree
> > that
> > > they should be the release, and then tell the incubator list we want to
> > > release them ?
> > >
> > > Ian
> > >
> > > On 13 Apr 2009, at 21:52, Kevin Brown wrote:
> > >
> > >> None of those 3 issues are actually release blockers. No feature request
> > >> is
> > >> ever a release blocker unless that feature was explicitly identified as
> > >> critical for the release at the beginning.
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Adam Winer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I don't think we should wait for any of those issues. Release, and
> > >>> release again.
> > >>>
> > >>> -- Adam
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Vincent Siveton <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi Ian,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2009/4/13 Ian Boston <[email protected]>:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I hate to bring it up again, but is it time to do a release on the
> > >>>>> 1.0.x
> > >>>>> branch ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am agree with you.
> > >>>> According Jira [1], we have 3 issues left and according the board
> > >>>> report, we plan to do a release of 1.0.x in this quarter.
> > >>>> So, could we fix them and make a release soon? Ping me if devs need
> > >>>> help.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Vincent
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310741&fixfor=12313553
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> >
