The release was 1/2 deployed, but after entering the password for the
101th time, I made a mistake, and deploy failed. Tried 3 times, and
gave up thinking that settings.xml was a better place, but couldn't
get that to work.
Ian
On 15 Apr 2009, at 13:16, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Weird! I saw the files
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/shindig/
Vincent
2009/4/15 Ian Boston <[email protected]>:
I have tried to the do the mvn release:perform but failed.
For some reason I am unable to configure the username and password in
settings.xml and so eventually I mistype at the prompt.
Any suggestions ?
Currently ~/.m2/settings.xml looks like, I have tried both password
and
private keys without sucess
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<settings>
<servers>
<server>
<id>apache.incubating</id>
<username>ieb</username>
<password>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</password>
</server>
</servers>
</settings>
I have validated the password as correct (obviously xxxx bear no
resemblance to my pw :)) on the command line.
Unfortunately the deploy is not complete and so information at
scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-
repository/org/apache/shindig
and
scp://people.apache.org/www/incubator.apache.org/shindig/
shindig-1.0.x/
is also going to be incomplete.
I hope the later one didn't break anything (sorry if it did)
Ian
On 15 Apr 2009, at 12:33, Ian Boston wrote:
I am probably too distant to anyone to do the signing, I running
the maven
release:perform at the moment, but I dont think anything is
getting signed,
or at least i am not being asked form gpg passphrase.
Ian
On 15 Apr 2009, at 12:18, Chris Chabot wrote:
The php's release script doesn't do any signing yet, but if your
willing
to
send the instructions of the release signature standards are for
apache
I'd
be happy to build that in
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Santiago Gala
<[email protected]>wrote:
El mar, 14-04-2009 a las 15:37 +0200, Chris Chabot escribió:
FYi the prefered packaging format for php-shindig is generated
by the
shindig/php/make-release.sh file.
in the 1.0.x branch it's version is currently set on 1.0, so just
executing
it will give you the appropriate
php-shindig-1.0.0.{tar.bz2,.tar.gz,zip}
files.
I'll do a final test on them once you guys are release ready
too, but
in
principle the 1.0.x branch & release script have been ready
since nov
last
year, so I don't expect any surprises on that end
Is there provision for signing the releases? I can sign the keys
of
whoever is going to do it if we get some out of band, remote way
to
verify identity WRT keys signature.
Regards
Santiago
-- Chris
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Vincent Siveton <[email protected]
wrote:
I guess the plan should be:
* release discussions: done by this thread
* prepare the release: mvn release:prepare which tags the code
* make the release: mvn release:perform which pushes (signed)
artifacts to repository.apache.org
* stage the generated Maven documentation
* propose a vote on this list: mail should include the urls
and the
closed/left issues.
* ask Incubator PMC for the release
* publish and announce the release
Anything else?
If everybody is agree with this plan, I could try to start the
process
this week.
Cheers,
Vincent
2009/4/13 Ian Boston <[email protected]>:
Being a release newbie with a desire to step into the
unknown, what
needs
to
be done ?
presumably, build some artifacts, sign them, put them
somewhere,
agree
that
they should be the release, and then tell the incubator list
we want
to
release them ?
Ian
On 13 Apr 2009, at 21:52, Kevin Brown wrote:
None of those 3 issues are actually release blockers. No
feature
request
is
ever a release blocker unless that feature was explicitly
identified
as
critical for the release at the beginning.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Adam Winer
<[email protected]>
wrote:
I don't think we should wait for any of those issues.
Release, and
release again.
-- Adam
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Vincent Siveton <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Ian,
2009/4/13 Ian Boston <[email protected]>:
I hate to bring it up again, but is it time to do a
release on
the
1.0.x
branch ?
I am agree with you.
According Jira [1], we have 3 issues left and according
the board
report, we plan to do a release of 1.0.x in this quarter.
So, could we fix them and make a release soon? Ping me if
devs
need
help.
Cheers,
Vincent
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310741&fixfor=12313553
