Hi Le 14/01/2011 17:56, Marc-Olivier Barre a écrit : >> But did you look at Thruk? It will be a better UI if you use a Shinken >> backend. Now it got "special views" with a Shinken core, like "only >> root problems" view, criticity sorting with dynamic value, and >> business rules tree views too :) >> >> (and no database = less problems :) ). > > Yup. We are considering both Thruk and Ninja. Ninja seems to have the > advantage of being able to integrate graphs from nagvis and from cacti. > And hell, it looks nicer... Thruk would work. But it does need a serious > user interface rework. It is beyond ugly. > Although I agree with you. Livestatus is the future. We have too many > databases.
Did someone try Multisite ( http://mathias-kettner.de/checkmk_multisite.html ) with Shinken ? It's nice looking ( http://mathias-kettner.de/check_mk_multisite_screenshots.html ) and much easier to setup (and does not require half of CPAN). -- Stéphane Urbanovski ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Shinken-devel mailing list Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
