On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:36 +0100, Flyinvap wrote: > Le 18/01/2011 15:28, Marc-Olivier Barre a écrit : > > > My colleagues just need some kind of "proof" (nothing formal really) > > that the improvements brought by shinken where proposed to nagios and > > either refused or just left unreplied to. > > Some discussions from nagios-devel archives [0]. > > [0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.nagios.devel/7099 >
Hey again, Thanks for this ! Interesting thread. I read it all and I now have my eyes bleeding... But that's another story ;) I'm still a little confused about what I read though. Here's what I understood from this thread: - Ethan Galstad never took the time to reply (publicly I mean) - Andreas Ericsson did take the time to seriously consider taking some, if not all of the ideas behind shinken into nagios 4, even considering a full rewrite - It all ended up in some kind of usual language flame war Nap, did I miss something ? was there some off list talk involved that we don't know of ? Cheers, -- Marc-Olivier Barre Avencall 10 bis, rue Lucien Voilin - 92800 Puteaux Tél. : 0811 85 9486 (0811 85 XIVO) http://www.avencall.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Shinken-devel mailing list Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
