I agree - the Quickstart main is good enough as a unit-test-like example to demonstrate the API. Beyond that, a proper standalone example application should probably demonstrate a nicer feature set (like aspectj integration). Good idea :)
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Kalle Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote: > Wanted to close out SHIRO-129 (aspectj integration) so I just > mavenized and committed the contributed sample (not attached to the > reactor build yet). We also have a rudimentary standalone sample which > actually isn't much of an app but just main that behaves like a unit > test. The aspectj sample doesn't have main() at the moment but the > sample domain is decent and complete enough so we could easily create > a simple standalone app around it. I'm thinking that we should just > drop the current standalone, rename the aspectj as the standalone > sample and make it a runnable desktop app. What say you? > > Kalle >
