Kalle, have you started to move this stuff? I was just about to commit changes to most of those files by adding in the ASF header, but I thought I'd check first to avoid merge conflicts.
- Les On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree - the Quickstart main is good enough as a unit-test-like > example to demonstrate the API. Beyond that, a proper standalone > example application should probably demonstrate a nicer feature set > (like aspectj integration). Good idea :) > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Kalle Korhonen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Wanted to close out SHIRO-129 (aspectj integration) so I just >> mavenized and committed the contributed sample (not attached to the >> reactor build yet). We also have a rudimentary standalone sample which >> actually isn't much of an app but just main that behaves like a unit >> test. The aspectj sample doesn't have main() at the moment but the >> sample domain is decent and complete enough so we could easily create >> a simple standalone app around it. I'm thinking that we should just >> drop the current standalone, rename the aspectj as the standalone >> sample and make it a runnable desktop app. What say you? >> >> Kalle >> >
