On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Kalle Korhonen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Very good. Yes, using the property was really the only reason why they >> needed to be signed. I'd rather not if that can be avoided. It's been >> awhile since I've last worked on webstart apps myself. I'll see if I >> can easily get it working by using an argument instead. > Cool. This should help:
Well, actually the problem is not the jnlp file but SecureRemoteInvocationFactory itself as it tries to do System.getProperty(SESSION_ID_SYSTEM_PROPERTY_NAME) - are you suggesting I change that whole approach to handle it differently? > Yeah, I agree - I guess I was thinking more along the lines of > extended integration across multiple technologies in addition to > samples - kind of like why wicket-stuff exists. It is also > interesting that their project exists outside of Apache so the > community can write samples and integration code for whatever they > want, even if it's not Apache compatible (GPL, LGPL, etc). Something > to think about if the community finds a need for something like this. Yeah, but Shiro being a fairly-well established security project, other projects hosted elsewhere are already integrating our stuff so I don't think we need to host everything-and-the-kitchen-sink integration projects as part of Shiro. But on case by case by I suppose - we'll do one if we need one. Kalle
