On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Well, actually the problem is not the jnlp file but
>> SecureRemoteInvocationFactory itself as it tries to do
>> System.getProperty(SESSION_ID_SYSTEM_PROPERTY_NAME) - are you
>> suggesting I change that whole approach to handle it differently?
> Ah, yes, I see the problem now.  Yeah, we should probably find a
> different approach entirely, but I think the solution could be pretty
> simple:
> A probably sufficient solution would be to set a static property in
> WebStartDriver's main method before instantiating the
> ApplicationContext.  Then you can reference that property from within
> the Spring xml when defining the SecureRemoteInvocationFactory bean.

Yeah, that's nice and simple - I'll get it implemented thanks! In
fact, it would almost obsolete catching the exception, since it should
likely prefer a session id that is explicitly set. Almost, not
completely though - the code still would reach the part the gets it
from the sessionid if the previous exception is caught and ignored.

Kalle

Reply via email to