That was my understanding as well - that once Craig and Alan voted
(and assuming they were both +1s) and no binding -1's at the end of
the 72 hour period, that we could then formulate an Incubator vote
thread referencing our vote thread, where it required 3 or more
binding +1s at that time.

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Kalle Korhonen
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Replying to Craig as well. I thought the process is that PPMC votes
> first, and only if that's successful, we'd post on the general list
> for the incubator PMC to vote on the release. According to
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote:
> "The conventional process is for the podling to follow the usual
> Apache process (including TODO: link release vote) and then call for a
> Incubator PMC VOTE on the TODO: link general incubator list. "
> Also on the same page:
> "All votes are welcome, but only those votes by the project's PPMC
> members (or IPMC members) count towards the final tally."
>
> Please advice.
>
> Kalle
>
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Actually, for a podling, only the Incubator PMC members votes count, though 
>> it's good that the podling PMC, PPMC, also vets and votes on the release.
>>
>> We have one vote, me, and I'm sure Craig will jump in as well.  If we don't 
>> get three IPMC votes then we have to pass the vote on to the Incubator.  If 
>> we do have three binding votes then all we need to do is to notify the 
>> Incubator and wait 72 hours.  Either way it's 72 hours after this vote.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On May 21, 2010, at 7:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding) (we need one more binding vote).
>>>
>>> Kalle
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Alan
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 21, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
>>>>>> 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
>>>>>> Apache/Maven release process as documented at
>>>>>> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/apache-release.html. Note
>>>>>> that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
>>>>>> convenience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first vote failed because the pom.xml ->
>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/static/1.0.0-incubating/team-list.html
>>>>>> developer list was incomplete. This is fixed directly in the tag and
>>>>>> it's the only change made since the first vote. The binaries are
>>>>>> re-deployed and re-staged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The issues solved for 1.0.0 (after the project entered Apache incubator):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310950&styleName=Html&version=12314078
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shiro/tags/shiro-root-1.0.0-incubating/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Staging repo for binaries:
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheshiro-005/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Staging site:
>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/static/1.0.0-incubating/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Project website (just for informational purposes, not to be voted upon):
>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Guide to testing staged releases:
>>>>>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours. Please do examine the source and binaries before
>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
>>>>>> successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to