Yes, that's what I'm thinking. I should have said "vote open minimum
of 72 hours" in the original post, hopefully my intention was clear
enough.

Kalle


On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote:
> We have 2 binding votes so far!  I'm sure Craig will vote soon enough.
>
> Let's hold this open until he submits his vote.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On May 21, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>
>> This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
>> 1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
>> Apache/Maven release process as documented at
>> http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/apache-release.html. Note
>> that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
>> convenience.
>>
>> The first vote failed because the pom.xml ->
>> http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/static/1.0.0-incubating/team-list.html
>> developer list was incomplete. This is fixed directly in the tag and
>> it's the only change made since the first vote. The binaries are
>> re-deployed and re-staged.
>>
>> The issues solved for 1.0.0 (after the project entered Apache incubator):
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310950&styleName=Html&version=12314078
>>
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shiro/tags/shiro-root-1.0.0-incubating/
>>
>> Staging repo for binaries:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheshiro-005/
>>
>> Staging site:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/static/1.0.0-incubating/
>>
>> Project website (just for informational purposes, not to be voted upon):
>> http://incubator.apache.org/shiro/
>>
>> Guide to testing staged releases:
>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
>>
>> Vote open for 72 hours. Please do examine the source and binaries before 
>> voting.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> Note that Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
>> successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
>
>

Reply via email to