Good observation, but please someone correct me if I am offbase: If the only factor of difference in a head is only Ti vs say SS, (no other changes) there is no traj difference.
As far as bigger heads, to establish effect on traj, we need to determine specifically where the COG is due to the items: If no other changes and the COG is moved further away from the ball, traj will be higher. If no other changes and COG is higher in relation to the ball's equator, traj will be lower. I have not seen anything noting where the benefits/detriments cross if you were to plot them. (IE: At what point do the 2 start to counteract each other.) Tom W, not sure if you watch this post, but that test I believe would take someone with massive resources. Could you offer insight? Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 8/16/2002 9:07:24 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >> >> You ask if anyone has done testing/demos. Well, obviously you have. >> But how >> about simulations? They can also make the same point you do. In >> fact, for >> many mid-to-high handicap golfers, the higher loft is not only more >> accurate >> but longer as well. > > A few years ago Golf Digest did a test and determined that the ideal > loft for a 85 mph swing was 13 degrees. Of course this was before the > advent of large clubheads and Titanium. > > > Frank
