Hey RT,
Good to see your post.  I forgot (well almost anyway) about our resident touring engineer.  Visited his site for the first time in a while and forgot how informative it is.  Thanks.

Al

At 12:47 PM 9/26/2002, you wrote:

I'm not sure if this addresses the original poster's question, but John Kaufman discusses cpm differences between steel and graphite (light vs heavy shafts) in Tech Note 18 on his website.

www.csfa.com/techframe.htm

FWIW

RT

>From: "Childers, Tedd A"
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
>Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Steel vs. Graphite CPMs - Rule of Thumb?
>Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:50:02 -0400
>
>Ed,
>
>Agree with Mac that CPMs are CPMs, regardless of shaft type. However, the
>real issue is playability of different shafts at a given frequency, and that
>can vary greatly based on the factors that Mac mentions below. The DSFI and
>RSSR systems were developed to try and describe how certain shafts would
>play relative to one another, but both systems are far from perfect.
>Developing a system that would accurately factor in all of the variables
>that affect shaft playability is probably the holy grail of clubmaking.
>
>Tedd
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:35 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Steel vs. Graphite CPMs - Rule of Thumb?
>
>
>Ed,
>
>CPM equals CPM regardless of steel, graphite, titanium or fiberglass. A
>steel shaft oscillating at 250 CPM is the same stiffness as a graphite shaft
>oscillating at 250 CPM, assuming identical measurement methods. If the tip
>section profiles of the two shafts are different then the two shafts will
>behave differently. The different weights of the two shafts will also
>greatly affect the feel of the shafts. This would be equally true of two
>different graphite shafts of different weights and different tip section
>profiles but with identical butt section frequency measurements. That being
>said I don't believe that there is any "rule of thumb" equivalency formula
>to compare shafts made of different materials.
>
>Rich "Mac" McHattie
>Mac's Golf
>
>
>
>LEGAL NOTICE
>Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.


Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here

Reply via email to