Andrew Suffield wrote: > ... >> But beware -- ipt6tables does not support any form of NAT. > > So if you want to deploy ipv6 in production alongside an existing ipv4 > network (like, say, the internet), then you're screwed.
No, you're simply obliged to route IPv6, even if your current IPv4 setup uses NAT. My understanding is that the formulators of IPv6 view NAT as a hack that works around the limitations in IPv4 that they removed in IPv6. To a certain extent i understand their philosophy, although i'm not convinced NAT is as evil as they say it is... -- Paul <http://paul.gear.dyndns.org> -- Did you know? Email viruses spread using addresses they find on the host computer. You can help to reduce the spread of these viruses by using Bcc: instead of To: on mass mailings, or using mailing list software such as mailman (http://www.list.org/) instead.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
