On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Paul Gear wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > ... > >> But beware -- ipt6tables does not support any form of NAT. > > > > So if you want to deploy ipv6 in production alongside an existing ipv4 > > network (like, say, the internet), then you're screwed. > > No, you're simply obliged to route IPv6, even if your current IPv4 setup > uses NAT. My understanding is that the formulators of IPv6 view NAT as > a hack that works around the limitations in IPv4 that they removed in > IPv6. To a certain extent i understand their philosophy, although i'm > not convinced NAT is as evil as they say it is...
I think you missed the point - if the only way to handle a combined ipv4/ipv6 setup is to use ip6tables for everything, then you cannot use NAT for your *ipv4* network. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
