On 3/6/13 5:24 PM, "Mr Dash Four" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Please try the attached patch. I believe that it is creating the correct >> shell code but I don't have a convenient way to test it. >> >Nope, the BLACKHOLE.patch which was attached to this isn't doing >anything to the table I defined in providers. The pre-defined routes for >the interface used in "providers" are copied over, but nothing else. My >"providers" file (for testing this) is very simple: > >tbl 2 - main eth0 <gw_address> - none The attached patch on top of BLACKHOLE.patch works for me. -Tom You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.
BLACKHOLE2.patch
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
