On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:10:50 +0100 Bruno Friedmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mainting the openSUSE/SLE shorewall rpm there's a question raised > actually if I should add a firewalld (systemd-firewall) as conflict. > > For years now, the openSUSE package had a conflict with SuSEfirewall2 > (the internal iptables managing system), which has make sense. > > But now, with the introduction of firewalld shall I add this one in > conflict. Or some of you (especially, pov from maintainer for other > distributions) have proved experience there's no interference between > both product ? Both can be installed at same time, but only one can be used. That's why both shorewall.service and shorewall6.service have proper Conflicts for firewalld.service to make sure you can't enable both at same time. Package shouldn't conflict becasue both can be installed at same time, there is no file level conflict. -- Tuomo Soini <[email protected]> Foobar Linux services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy <https://foobar.fi/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Shorewall-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
