On dimanche, 19 novembre 2017 23.25:48 h CET Tuomo Soini wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:10:50 +0100
>
> Bruno Friedmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Mainting the openSUSE/SLE shorewall rpm there's a question raised
> > actually if I should add a firewalld (systemd-firewall) as conflict.
> >
> > For years now, the openSUSE package had a conflict with SuSEfirewall2
> > (the internal iptables managing system), which has make sense.
> >
> > But now, with the introduction of firewalld shall I add this one in
> > conflict. Or some of you (especially, pov from maintainer for other
> > distributions) have proved experience there's no interference between
> > both product ?
>
> Both can be installed at same time, but only one can be used. That's
> why both shorewall.service and shorewall6.service
> have proper Conflicts for firewalld.service to make sure you can't
> enable both at same time.
>
> Package shouldn't conflict becasue both can be installed at same time,
> there is no file level conflict.
Hi Tuomo,
Thanks, this will help me to clean-up the heritage.
And it make absolutely sense.
--
Bruno Friedmann
Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch
Bareos Partner, openSUSE Member, fsfe fellowship
GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227
irc: tigerfoot
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-devel
