Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:50:54AM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:

> 
>  - The code should be hugely simpler to understand (any non-trivial
>  program written in shell spends half the code working around the
>  limitations of shell), which makes it much more practical for random
>  third parties like me to make minor changes. I've tried doing stuff
>  with the shell version before, and gave up because it was just too
>  much effort.

It's a lot of effort for me too and the code is getting very fragile;
that makes it hard to add anything without breaking something else.
> 
>  - perl -d
> 

Yes. Shorewall 3.4.2 supports -d (debug) and -p (profile) options to the
'compile' command.

> It also occurs to me that a new approach is going to be needed to
> replace the old 'shorewall trace'.

I've been thinking about that. I suspect that I'll have people package
up their config directory and send it to me. I'll probably implement an
/sbin/shorewall command to collect everything needed.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to