On Mon, 2007-30-04 at 07:42 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: > Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > Is there any reason why the output of /usr/share/shorewall-lite/shorecap > > is stored on the shorewall-lite target and then scp'd to the shorewall > > administrative machine? Why not just capture the output of it directly > > to the administrative machine all in one go? > > Because the implementor is an idiot, I guess.
Tom, I am sorry if that is how I came across. I didn't mean it that way. :-( I was being quite sincere in my question. I couldn't find any where in shorewall-lite that that file was used directly -- other than being available to copy by shorewall (proper), but was willing to be corrected before I dove in to fix it. b. -- My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server. Brian J. Murrell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
