Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Mon, 2007-30-04 at 07:42 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: >> Brian J. Murrell wrote: >>> Is there any reason why the output of /usr/share/shorewall-lite/shorecap >>> is stored on the shorewall-lite target and then scp'd to the shorewall >>> administrative machine? Why not just capture the output of it directly >>> to the administrative machine all in one go? >> Because the implementor is an idiot, I guess. > > Tom, I am sorry if that is how I came across. I didn't mean it that > way. :-( I was being quite sincere in my question. I couldn't find > any where in shorewall-lite that that file was used directly -- other > than being available to copy by shorewall (proper), but was willing to > be corrected before I dove in to fix it.
There is no reason to have the capabilities file resident on the Shorewall Lite firewall system. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
