On Nov 7, 2007 5:37 AM, Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Example: > > 0x100 192.168.1.44 0.0.0.0/0 > 0x200 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 25 > > A TCP packet from 192.168.1.44 with destination port 25 would end > up with a mark value of 0x300 whereas the expected value is 0x200. If I add a mark for traffic shaping in this case, prior to the above two rules, making them look like
0x11 192.168.1.44 0.0.0.0/0 0x100 192.168.1.44 0.0.0.0/0 0x200 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 25 What would be the effect of the patch? Would that mean that the provider rule over-writes the shaping rule? Or should I be using the mask? Thanks, Prasanna. -- www.elinanetworks.com Seamless, secure delivery of applications. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
