On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 15:58 -0500, Mark Rutherford wrote: > Thanks for taking a crack at it. > Here is the updated dump. > I tried port 80 and 21 from 70.60.208.84 to 216.176.235.187 with no joy. > > > Shorewall Guy wrote: > > Shorewall Guy wrote: > > > >> Mark Rutherford wrote: > >> > >>> No change. > >>> Should I send another dump? > >>> > >> What you have now should be correct. I personally have no more ideas. > >> > >> > > > > But if you send another one, maybe someone else will see something... > >
This looks funny.... Routing Rules 0: from all lookup 255 1000: from all iif eth2 lookup Twc <<<<<<<<< 1000: from all iif lo lookup Nuvox 10001: from all fwmark 0x1 lookup Nuvox 10002: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup Twc 11000: from all iif eth2 lookup Twc <<<<<<<<<< 20000: from 216.176.235.186 lookup Nuvox 20001: from 216.176.235.187 lookup Nuvox 20002: from 216.176.235.188 lookup Nuvox 20003: from 216.176.235.189 lookup Nuvox 20004: from 216.176.235.190 lookup Nuvox 20256: from 70.61.215.98 lookup Twc 20257: from 70.61.215.99 lookup Twc 20258: from 70.61.215.100 lookup Twc 20259: from 70.61.215.101 lookup Twc 20260: from 70.61.215.102 lookup Twc 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default The original rule didn't get cleared when you changed the route_rule from 1000 to 11000 or do you have both rules present? Just my 2 cents, Jerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
