Thanks Christophe, I tried adding the :F to the rules for mark 3 and mark 4. the CABAL isn't a server, it's a client, but we had some issues with browsing (mark 2) clobbering gaming (mark 2 as well at the time, now mark 4), so we added a mark 4 entry for cabal, now cabal runs fine.
I added :F as you suggested to the two rules, but now it still doesn't work, and all my bt traffic is still getting dumped into 10:11 The configs are still the same as my previous paste with the addition of :F http://pastebin.com/vuevjvmc Christophe wrote: > Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 22:38 -0700, Christ Schlacta a écrit : >> here, I'll help. my tc is behaving wierdly. >> >> my router had to get updated early (debian 5) and now everything is more >> or less working (a harddrive died) so I updated to the latest shorewall >> 4.4.9 and my kernel is now 2.6.32-bpo.4-amd64. I haven't built ipp2p >> yet nor ipset matching, but I have plans to. the TC works almost >> flawlessly now! Every day when comcast changes my upstream bandwidth, I >> have to re-calculate my speed and restart shorewall, but once it's >> properly calibrated for the hour, it works perfectly. >> >> right now I have transmission running full speed with downloads and >> uploads, and I still get ~70msec pings and 800-1200kbit upload speeds to >> my test server of choice. (4k up is broken into 2k for transmission, >> and 2k to split between the other services. >> >> >> it looks like all my traffic is getting sent to the wrong class (or is >> it mark? I'm still not sure), yet somehow I'm getting satisfactory >> performance anyway.. >> http://pastebin.com/vuevjvmc >> > As I understand, 10.0.0.161 is your Transmission host. You may move the > marking rule into tcfor, or it will reset to 0 (*) entering FORWARD: > 3:F 10.0.0.161 0.0.0.0/0 all > Unless the CABAL server (?) is your router, I would do the same: > 4:F 10.0.0.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 38113 > > You can monitor current classes utilization with > watch tc -s class show dev <yournetdev> > It will quickly show you any problem with classifying by looking at rate > values. > > * I hardly understand this rule, is it related with routing tables > handling? > > Christophe > >> Tom Eastep wrote: >>> 4 days without a post -- I'm suffering Shorewall Support Withdrawal :-) >>> >>> -Tom >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shorewall-users mailing list >>> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shorewall-users mailing list >> Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Shorewall-users mailing list > Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
