On 10/6/2014 10:21 AM, PGNd wrote:
>
>> Analogous to INITFILE, SERVICEFILE is intended to be the name of the
>> *source* file, not the destination file.
>
> Then I'd misunderstood, as, in shorewallrc, these do NOT cause errors
>
> INITFILE=${PRODUCT}
> INITFILE=${PRODUCT}-TEST
> SERVICEFILE=${PRODUCT}.service
>
> otoh, this DOES
>
> SERVICEFILE=${PRODUCT}-TEST.service
>
> As they're supposed to be analogous, I'll figure out the different behavior I
> see.
>
> That said, is it, then, otherwise possible to specify the naming of the
> written shorewall*.service files?
>
> My goal is version specificity -- if it's doable in SW's build system, great.
> If not, then I'll work around it.I would prefer not to have two different variables related to the service file. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
