On 6/1/20 9:24 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 6/1/20 4:51 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>>> @ local
> 
>> You are missing a default route: via fd10:254:254::1 dev wg0
> 
>>> @ remote
> 
>> That route is incorrect -- it should be via fd10:254:254::1 dev wg0.
> 
> Thanks!  Obviously non-obvious to me :-/
> 
> Such routes can be set/handled by
> 
>       system networking (systemd-networkd stack, in my case)
>       wireguard scripts
>       shorewall itself
> 
> 
> is there any rationale for choosing one over the other?
> 
> if shorewall's a realistic option, where best to set the routes?
> 

For route (such as these) in the main routing table, I prefer the system
networking config files.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster
Shoreline,         \    with an international standard?
Washington, USA     \ A: Someone who makes you an offer you
http://shorewall.org \    can't understand
                      \________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to