On 07/28/2011 02:56 PM, Chris Lombaard wrote:

Backups are very serious business and if the Shotwell development team would
be willing to take on the challenge I will support the feature. Their is
nothing like losing all your photos after a disk crash. Experienced it once,
not fooling myself twice.

Backup is indeed *very* serious business, and hence I think it's not shotwell's responsibility to handle it. If every program I have tries to backup it's data, I have to verify lots of different backup mechanisms + it would probably mess up my backup.

I've been using the multi_backup.sh found on the lower part of http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/121604 for local backup and plain rsync for remote backup for years, works like a charm, it's *very* fast, and stores files just like that.

I'm sure other people have other suggestions for backup, but I really think it would be a waste of energy to implement a backup feature in shotwell.

Just my .01 euro...

--
Atte

http://atte.dk   http://modlys.dk
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell

Reply via email to