On 31 January 2013 01:53, go linux <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/30/13, Colin Law <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 29 January 2013 22:49, go linux <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Oh and why was it working properly in September but not in January? >>> Seems some sort of regression was introduced in the months since then. >> >> There is the issue of why rhythmbox is running in the first place, >> perhaps it was not previously running and that is the change (for >> unknown reason). >> >> Colin >> >>> >>> > > Would this be a valid test? I don't have a live Squeeze-Gnome disk or > I would boot it to see if rhythmbox is launched on a 'clean' system > without user intervention. If it is, that would mean. it's always > been that way and something else is causing the current bug.
Quite possibly. Also you could try (on your system) logging on as a different user to see whether it automatically runs there. If you don't have another user then create one, a test user is often a useful thing to have available. If it does not run for the test user then it is something in your main user setup. Colin _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
