On 1/29/13, Colin Law <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 January 2013 23:10, Jim Nelson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've mentioned it on a Rhythmbox ticket on Launchpad, but haven't gone any
>> farther than that.  I'm not certain this is a de facto Rhythmbox bug, at
>> least for the majority of our users.
>>
>> If you look at Luis' comments, it does look like there's something going
>> on with how we're talking to the camera, so it's quite possible this is
>> fundamentally a Shotwell bug.  Hopefully we'll know more in the next
>> couple of days.
>>
>> -- Jim
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:49 PM, go linux <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 1/28/13, Jim Nelson wrote:
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> Luis Arias has been looking into this problem and has done some
>>> fantastic
>>> debugging. I recommend looking at his notes from the past couple of
>>> days:
>>>
>>> http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4512
>>>
>>> -- Jim
>>>
>>
>> Great that shotwell is looking into this bug. So far there has been
>> no response to my query on the pkg-gnome-maintainers mailing list. :(
>>
>> While it would be great to get shotwell fixed, I'm thinking . . . if
>> the same bug not only affects shotwell but f-spot and gtkam too, isn't
>> the problem outside of shotwell? Have you communicated at all with the
>> rhythmbox folks? Or other apps that are tied into rhtyhmbox?
>
> I am confused, is it not exactly this bug [1], which references [2]
> which was reported in the version of Rhythmbox the OP is using and
> seems to have been fixed in a later version.
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/rhythmbox/+bug/544994
> [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615743
>
> Colin
>

That certainly sounds like what I have experienced.  If there is a
fix, why hasn't it found its way into squeeze or the backports?  I'll
post those two references on the pkg-gnome-maintainers list to jog
their collective memories . . .
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell

Reply via email to