On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:07:38PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote: > Martin Jansa <[email protected]> writes: > > > In case you're already building shr-core... > > Do you recommend building in shr-core now, or in shr-unstable? > (Assuming that one wants the bleeding edge.)
Both are quite similar wrt used versions, except shr-core tracks EFL trunk. If you want shr-u with EFL trunk you can merge few patches from https://gitorious.org/shr/shr-experimental/commits/master Otherwise it's similar (sometimes I upgrade something first in shr-u and then in shr-c, sometimes it's vice versa, but I'm trying to keep them in sync). Problem I see with shr-core now, is that it's rebuilt quite often due to changed shared state checksums http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00907.html maybe too often if you just need to sometimes build something with customizations. Also I'll be away from computers for almost whole Juny, July and I don't know if someone will keep shr-core in sync (as I won't be able to make it "default" before I leave..) Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
pgp0UViUm2VYc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Shr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
