> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandy Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tim Christensen
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Sidr] Multiple Signatures on a ROA
>
> >ARIN has never assigned address space in a manner consistent
> with the
> >hypot= hetical cases raised on the SIDR list, and it is
> unlikely that
> >it would eve= r do so.
>
> I'm confused.
>
> The ARIN NPRM says:
>
[policy regarding reserves elided]
>
> That's the sort of reserve for future allocation I was talking about.
>
> These quotes are from the IPv6 portion of the manual, but I
> thought from many references in conversation, email, etc. to
> space reserved for expansion that this occurred in IPv4 as well.

The examples raised on-list, in my understanding, referred to the following:

-- The possibility of two adjacent allocations from the same source being 
issued at different times with different validity periods and the single issuer 
being unwilling to issue an aggregate cert (Dr. Kent, 7/31/07)

For this example (and ignoring the unwilling-to-issue part) ARIN has never, and 
will likely never, issue adjacent allocations at different times, ***with 
different validity periods*** (end point validity, that is).  All reserves 
allocations of adjacent space conform to the validity period of the address 
block being extended.  (FWIW, ARIN would not issue 'experimental' space that is 
contiguous/aggregatable with 'normal' space either, and has never been asked to 
nor done so.)

-- The possibility of two (or more) adjacent allocations, received by the same 
entity, coming from two (or more) different sources.

For this example, ARIN has never issued resources to two (or more) different 
organizations who, by happenstance or purpose, have registered further 
adjacent, aggregatable downstream reallocations to a single third-party entity.

To be clear, I understood from the thread that the issues centered on 
differing-validity-periods-while-adjacent (not happening at ARIN) and 
split-parent-while-adjacent (in my opinion rare, and not seen at ARIN from our 
observations).

Tim

_______________________________________________
Sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to