> -----Original Message----- > From: Henk Uijterwaal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 1:38 AM > Subject: Re: [Sidr] Multiple Signatures on a ROA > > All, > > > Having thought about this a bit, I remain skeptical about > the need for > > or desirability of multiple signatures on ROAs. > > > > First, as others have mentioned, this is a relatively > low-probability > > hypothetical case, and if it occurs at all it would be the > result of > > an issuer deliberately chosing to make life complicated for its > > subjects. This does not strike me as a strong case for > complicating > > the protocol (if anything, it strikes me as the opposite, > absent proof > > that this complexity really is necessary). > > I agree with Rob here. I'd have no problem with extending > the protocol if there was a valid case for doing so. > However, the two cases that were mentioned on the list > so-far, are low probability cases that can be handled by > having 2 ROAs. Until somebody comes up with a third case > that needs this, let's not make things more complicated than > they already are.
Sorry I am late to this conversation, I've been on holiday for some time. ARIN has never assigned address space in a manner consistent with the hypothetical cases raised on the SIDR list, and it is unlikely that it would ever do so. Best regards to all, and happy to be back Tim Christensen _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
