On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote:
... Judging from the conversations I have seen, I suspect we don?t
have a system that doesn?t effect the balance of power.
In my opinion, it is a good idea to work on not changing the balance
of power. That may require that the allocation agencies *not* be part
of the key hierarchy.
Jeff,
I think this WG (and others) have been proceeding with the idea of
having the RIRs in the key heirarchy because it's logically
simpler: the key heirarchy would map the business relationships
present in the allocation heirarchy.
Trying to not upset the balance of power, while a great idea, might
require mapping the current power structure and possibly establishing
some more interactive relationships between the participants in it.
Do you have any good ideas of where to start?
-- Sam
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
