"Refuted" definitely has the right connotations.
I'm not fond of "unverified"... if "unknown" is not acceptable,
perhaps "undetermined" is a good term.
I still have reservations about using different terms than other
drafts. I would prefer to see one set of terminology for results from
the RPKI. Hopefully, one that doesn't conflict with other PKI usage.
Rob
--
Robert Loomans
On 24/05/2010, at 10:15, Terry Manderson <terry.mander...@icann.org>
wrote:
On 22/05/10 10:30 PM, "Robert Loomans" <robe...@apnic.net> wrote:
[ If you were to base a comparison function for sorting on this DB
lookup, I
believe it would have to look like this:
valid = 1
unknown = 0
invalid = -1
]
Does
[
Verified = 1
Unknown/unverified = 0
Refuted = -1
]
work in your mental map?
I find that the valid / invalid statements when applied to routing
terminology far from palatable. Especially when explaining or
deconstructing
the SIDR work to policy makers and other interested parties. Some of
which
actually do have significant routing experience and start thinking
that we
are somehow *changing* the BGP protocol itself and applying these
(almost)
black and white states.
Cheers
Terry
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
