At 6:32 AM -0700 4/1/11, John Scudder wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
i propose that i rev the doc to say
o the transport must provide authentication and integrity
o the current ssh description is an example
o other transport meeting the authentication and integrity constraints
are welcome
of course, this will leave open the mandatory-to-implement LCD issue.
sigh.
I think we shouldn't punt on a mandatory transport. I suggest
TCP-MD5 for practical reasons, including the open source support
issue Chris raised.
--John
I expect TCP-MD5 to be deprecated (soon?), since we have already
deprecated MD5. I don't think the IESG would approve of a reference
to that RFC.
Steve
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
