Hello,
Waking a longishly dead thread to call some form of consensus on what
is now rev16 of this draft:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-16

I believe we cycled around most of the heated parts, finding
compromise and reaching steady-state (last real message on this topic
was 5 or so days ago).

At this point I think we're safe to go forward to IESG review. I'll be
packaging up a protos doc and mailing that forward tomorrow.

-chris
(co-chair-in-training)

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Christopher Morrow
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok folk,
> The rpki-rtr document:
>  <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr>
>
> went through WGLC on version ~02, it's since had a slight mod (added a
> Cache-nonce added) which is here in section 4.1:
>
> "The Cache Nonce reassures the router that the serial numbers are
>   comensurate, i.e. the cache session has not been changed."
>
> and again in 4.2:
> "The Cache Nonce tells the cache what instance the router expects to
>   ensure that the serial numbers are comensurate, i.e. the cache
>   session has not been changed."
>
> and again in 4.4:
> "In response to a Reset Query, the Cache Nonce tells the router the
>   instance of the cache session for future confirmation.  In response
>   to a Serial Query, the Cache Nonce reassures the router that the
>   serial numbers are comensurate, i.e. the cache session has not been
>   changed."
>
> and again in 4.7:
> "The Cache Nonce MUST be the same as that of the corresponding Cache
>   Response which began the, possibly null, sequence of data PDUs."
>
> There's not much meat to the actual change, and the authors identified
> the problem on their own. So, in the spirit of valentines day, let's
> decide by Friday Feb 18, 2011 23:59 UTC if things are still ok to move
> forward. If there are no further comments/issues I'll push this
> version out over the weekend to the AD's as a publication request.
>
> -Chris
> <co-chair-messenger-bag==off>
>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to