> From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com] > Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 9:58 AM > To: George, Wes > Cc: sidr wg list > Subject: Re: various > > > Do you or do you not agree that on the transition between private ASN > > and public, if remove-private is configured, any signatures > containing > > private ASN must be removed even if the eBGP peer is BGPSec capable? > > with the statement as is, if it is a private asn or a public asn, it is > not signing.
[WEG] sigh. Let me try one more time. This question is not about confederations so "the statement" is not applicable. Think just bog-standard, vanilla eBGP, with two BGPSec speakers, one of whom is using a private ASN, announcing routes that must be carried to the DFZ. Make more sense now as to why I'm making the distinction between private and public ASN? Wes This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
