Hi Sandy, All I attended the Webex session this morning (Wednesday) and attempted the one on Monday.
Here is my experience: - Webex session was quick to launch and start today unlike Monday. - I used the IETF audio stream along with the Webex visual just to get an idea of real-time lag. (And as a backup in case Webex failed today.) Audio was behind with respect to slides by maybe 10-15 seconds. - The slides kept up very well and in sync with the jabber room logs. - Audience voices were very clear (I know that's not a Webex thing in my case) and discussion around the room was easy to follow. Plus Jabber logs today were excellent. Together it made for very easy comprehension. Eyes + Ears + Text All information streams together worked great to give a great experience. - My location: Columbia, Maryland, USA (~ Washington DC.) --Anuja -----Original Message----- From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Murphy, Sandra Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:42 AM To: sidr@ietf.org Subject: [sidr] remote participation experience today The webex session on Monday failed completely, due to laptop wireless incapability to maintain a connection (20-50-80-100% packet loss). The webex session on Wednesday (this morning) seemed to work (alternate networking arranged). But being the presentation laptop for webex, I was unable to see who (if any) the participants were. If you joined the webex session today, PLEASE do comment on the list of what you found worked or did not work for that experience. (Was your view of slides keeping up? were you listenting to webex telecon or to ietf audio stream? could you follow the discussion amongst those in the room? audio quality? etc.) It would help in figuring out the future virtual meetings. --Sandy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
